Search

Your search keyword '"Applequist, Wendy L."' showing total 450 results
Start Over Author "Applequist, Wendy L."
450 results on '"Applequist, Wendy L."'

9. DNA sequences as types: A discussion paper from the Special‐purpose Committee established at the XIX International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen, China

Author

Thiele, Kevin R., primary, Applequist, Wendy L., additional, Renner, Susanne S., additional, May, Tom W., additional, Dönmez, Ali A., additional, Groom, Quentin, additional, Lehtonen, Samuli, additional, Maggs, Christine A., additional, Malécot, Valéry, additional, and Yoon, Hwan Su, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 75.

Author

Applequist, Wendy L.

Subjects
VASCULAR plants, VALERIANA, PHYLLANTHUS, COMMITTEE reports, RHODODENDRONS, DENDROBIUM, OAK
Abstract

Summary: Rejection of the subfamily name Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae is not recommended. Conservation of the following 10 generic names is recommended: Ampelopsis with conserved type, Aria vs. Chamaemespilus and Torminalis, Bituminaria with conserved type, Dennstaedtia with conserved type, Klukia Racib. vs. Klukia Andrz. ex Besser, Osmelia vs. Stachycrater, Pycnarrhena vs. Antitaxis, Tetraphyllum Griff. ex C.B. Clarke vs. Tetraphyllum Hosius & Marck, Triraphis with conserved type, and Vella with conserved type. The following two generic names are not recommended for conservation: Lycaste vs. Anguloa and Xylobium and Mitrella vs. Pyramidanthe. The generic name Pacoseroca is recommended for rejection. The following 33 species names are recommended for conservation: Acalypha multicaulis vs. A. pruriens and A. ruderalis, Anethum segetum with conserved type, Bromus retusus vs. B. plukenetii, Cacao sylvestris with conserved type, Citrus reticulata with conserved type, Clerodendrum umbellatum with conserved type, Cycas riedlei Fisch. ex Gaudich. vs. C. riedlei Dum. Cours., Dendrobium officinale vs. D. catenatum, Dicksonia bipinnata with conserved type, Engelhardia roxburghiana with conserved type, Iris latifolia (Mill.) Voss vs. I. latifolia Heer, Isoetes sahyadrii with conserved type, Juncus acuminatus Michx. vs. J. acuminatus Balb., Kalanchoe rosei vs. K. bouvieri, Larrea nitida vs. Mimosa balsamica, Lilium humboldtii vs. L. puberulum, Loasa rudis vs. L. rhoeadifolia, Magnolia oblonga (Wall. ex Hook. f. & Thomson) Figlar vs. M. oblonga M. Chandler, Malus domestica vs. M. sylvestris, Myagrum paniculatum with conserved type, Oxalis eckloniana C. Presl vs. O. eckloniana F. Dietr. and O. bifolia, Phyllanthus claussenii with conserved type and vs. P. udicola, Phyllanthus flagelliformis vs. P. eurisladro, Phyllanthus klotzschianus vs. P. robustus, Prunus maackii vs. P. glandulifolia, Quercus frainetto vs. Q. conferta, Quercus pacifica Nixon & C.H. Mull. vs. Q. pacifica Knowlt., Ranunculus trichophyllus vs. R. peucedanifolius, Rubus ulmifolius vs. R. creticus, R. vulgaris, and R. inermis, Sida albida with conserved type, Solanum nitidibaccatum vs. S. stylesianum and Bosleria nevadensis, Thymus microphyllus with conserved type, and Valeriana scouleri with conserved type. The following five species names are not recommended for conservation: Aspidium devexum vs. A. membranaceum, Croton fuscescens vs. C. gnaphaloides, Daphniphyllum oldhamii vs. D. pentandrum, Rhododendron myrtifolium Schott & Kotschy vs. R. ×myrtifolium G. Lodd. ex Bosse, and Teucrium microphyllum vs. T. quadratulum. A proposal to conserve Echinocactus williamsii vs. E. williamsianus is noted to be unnecessary. The following 17 species names are recommended for rejection: Bryophyllum triangulare, Callitriche foliosa, Callitriche spuria, Commelina nimmoniana, Cuscuta aggregata, Dendrobium brownii, Eriostemon trinervis, Genista multicaulis, Grewia oppositifolia, Kalanchoe aleurodes, Marcgravia jacquinii, Narcissus flavus, Pereskia glomerata, Salsola coquimbana, Taxodium huegelii, Tulipa urumiensis, and Ulostoma filamentosum. The species name Thymus marschallianus is not recommended for rejection. It is recommended that the names Parisia and Parrisia not be treated as homonyms. The Committee recommends against making a binding decision on whether Silene dicolor and Silene discolor should be treated as homonyms, since they clearly should not be. It is recommended that Aethionema kopetdaghi be treated as validly published and that Anthurium ×macrolobum be treated as validly published by W. Bull ex T. Moore & Mast. (or Anon.). The Committee recommends against making a binding decision regarding the adequacy of the descriptive statement of Rhododendron humicola. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

40. DNAsequences as types: A discussion paper from the Special‐purpose Committee established at the XIXInternational Botanical Congress in Shenzhen, China

Author

Thiele, Kevin R., Applequist, Wendy L., Renner, Susanne S., May, Tom W., Dönmez, Ali A., Groom, Quentin, Lehtonen, Samuli, Maggs, Christine A., Malécot, Valéry, and Yoon, Hwan Su

Abstract

A special‐purpose Committee on DNA Sequences as Types was established at the XIX International Botanical Congress (IBC) in Shenzhen, China, in 2017, with a mandate to report to the XX IBC in Madrid in 2024 with recommendations on a preferred course of action with respect to potential amendments of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plantsto allow DNA sequences as types. This is the first in an expected series of papers from the Special‐purpose Committee on this issue. We set out the background to the establishment of the Committee, explore key issues around typification that are pertinent to the question of DNA sequences as types, enumerate pros and cons of allowing DNA sequences as types, and foreshadow options for future discussion and potential recommendations.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

41. Deparia chinensis X. S. Guo & C. Du

Author

Zhang, Jian-Hang, Du, Cheng, Applequist, Wendy L., and Liao, Shuai

Subjects
Tracheophyta, Athyriaceae, Deparia, Polypodiales, Biodiversity, Polypodiopsida, Plantae, Deparia chinensis, Taxonomy
Abstract

Deparia chinensis (Ching) X.S.Guo & C.Du in Chen (2016: 18). ≡ Dryoathyrium chinense Ching in Jin (1988: 36). Lectotype (designated by Hsu and Kuo in Kuo et al. 2018):— CHINA. Chongqing [Szechuan]: Chengkou [Chen-kou Hsien], 2100 m, 17 October 1958, T. L.Tai 106702 (PE barcode 00049936 [photo!], isolectotypes HNWP barcode 0219360 [photo!], IBK barcode 00034139 [photo!], IBSC barcode 0676556 [photo!], NAS barcode 00082856 [photo!], PE barcode 00049937 [photo!], SZ barcodes 00149268 [photo!] & 00149269 [photo!], WUK barcode 0130652 [photo!]). – Dryoathyrium chinense Ching (1974: 214), not validly published, with two gatherings indicated as types, contrary to Art. 40.2. – Dryoathyrium chinense Ching in Hsieh (1985: 153), not validly published, with the identity of the type not explicitly indicated, contrary to Art. 40 Note 2. – Deparia chinensis (Ching) Z.R.Wang in He et al. (2013: 422), new combination not validly published, with incorrect reference to basionym, contrary to Art. 41.5. – Deparia chinensis (Ching) T.C.Hsu & L.Y.Kuo in Kuo et al. (2018: 651), isonym., Published as part of Zhang, Jian-Hang, Du, Cheng, Applequist, Wendy L. & Liao, Shuai, 2023, An overview on the valid publication and typification of Dryoathyrium chinense and Deparia chinensis (Athyriaceae, Aspleniineae, Polypodiales), pp. 67-69 in Phytotaxa 579 (1) on page 68, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.579.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/7532153, {"references":["Chen, Y. - S. (2016) The Checklist of Shaanxi Vascular Plants. Higher Education Press, Beijing, 525 pp.","Jin, S. - Y. (1988) Bibliography of new taxa (Cormophytes) and type specimens in the herbaria of China (I). Bulletin of Botanical Research, Harbin, Supplement: 1 - 117.","Kuo, L. - Y., Ebihara, A., Hsu, T. - C., Rouhan, G., Huang, Y. - M., Wang, C. - N., Chiou, W. - L. & Kato, M. (2018) Infrageneric Revision of the Fern Genus Deparia (Athyriaceae, Aspleniineae, Polypodiales). Systematic Botany 43: 645 - 655. https: // doi. org / 10.1600 / 036364418 X 697364","Ching, R. - C. (1974) Dryoathyrium Ching. In: Editorial Committee of Flora Tsinlingensis (Eds.) Flora Tsinlingensis 2. Science Press, Beijing, pp. 100 - 101 & 213 - 215.","Hsieh, Y. - T. (1985) The taxonomy of Dryoathyrium Ching in China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, Harbin 5 (3): 147 - 157. Available from: https: // bbr. nefu. edu. cn / CN / abstract / abstract 1781. shtml (accessed 12 January 2022)","He, Z. - R., Wang, Z. - R. & Kato, M. (2013) Deparia Hooker & Greville. In: Wu, Z. - Y., Raven, P. H. & Hong, D. - Y. (Eds.) Flora of China 2 - 3. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp. 418 - 442. Available from: http: // www. efloras. org / florataxon. aspx? flora _ id = 2 & taxon _ id = 109640 (accessed 12 January 2022)"]}

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results